Violins and Starships

Around the House

July 7th, 2009

I suppose Twitter is good for something once in a while, depending on who you follow. crazyfillyjonk, known elsewhere simply as Fillyjonk, linked to this good news about light bulbs. Incandescent bulbs might not be going away completely.

Now I have one important question. What about clear incandescent bulbs? I am more or less resigned to compact florescents (though I do have complaints about them) but in some fixtures only clear bulbs look right. For example, last week we went a little crazy and bought this ceiling fan and installed it in our dining area. (It looks a lot nicer than the picture.) I actually liked this one better but my other half liked the clear glass shades on the one we got better and for me it was very close so I let him have his way. But, as I was saying, it just wouldn’t look right with anything but clear incandescent bulbs and I worry that in a few years we won’t be able to get them anymore. (It is possible to replace the shades if necessary.)

~ ~ ~

Remember this? I like it so well I got an (approximately 16″ X 20″) enlargement of it. This was a real “I LOVE modern technology” moment. I emailed the digital photo to Apertures Photo in Tulsa and a few days later the print was delivered to my house. It turned out fantastic and I didn’t have to drive to Tulsa to get it. Besides the convenience it is a much higher quality enlargement than anything I ever got with film. Even the 5″ X 7″ enlargements I got from 35mm negatives were unacceptably poor but I have this huge print made from a digital image and it looks absolutely professional.

I took it to a shop in the Nearby Small Town and got it professionally framed. They do great work too and I’m torn between wanting to give them a well-deserved plug and not wanting to identify my location too closely. It’s hanging on our living room wall now. I can hardly believe I took that picture myself. It’s making me want to decorate the living room. I already had sort of a decorating plan in mind (That is, I know what color I want to paint the walls.) but now I’m really wanting to make the room look worthy of this picture. (as well as the few other nice things we have)

Update: Thanks,Michael Bates for the link. Apertures Photo does do great work. This was the second time I’ve been a customer there. Over a year ago I had copies made of an heirloom photograph and those turned out excellent too. —

~ ~ ~

We still don’t have any ripe tomatoes and very few green ones or blooms but the plants are looking great. I think I need whatever kind of fertilizer it is that is good for fruit production. I know what it is but I always forget. Tomatoes are the only vegetables we grow. As usual I have too few flowers but I do have some that are looking good.

~ ~ ~

I need to spend more time reading. That’s funny… I’m making it sound like something I like to do is an obligation but I have all of these things I really want to read and I seem to have a hard time getting around to them. I’m a couple of months behind in reading Smithsonian, as usual. We still get Bee Culture magazine even though our hives died a couple of years ago and I intend to read at least some of the articles in those but I’ve hardly looked at them for several months. And my husband gets a magazine related to the industry he works in that sometimes has articles that I like to read. That’s it for the dead tree magazines. I’m always seeing things online that I intend to go back to and read later but more often than not I don’t get around to them.

I’m almost finished reading Crossroads of Time from my Andre Norton treasure trove and I’m eager to get into some of the others. I don’t know if I will read them all straight through or read other books in between. I’m thinking I’ll do the latter. When you read 50-year-old science fiction you sort of have to put yourself in a different frame of mind to keep from being constantly amused by the quaintness and simplicity of it all. (Trans-dimensional cell phones would come in really handy at times.) I read two different, unrelated, stories by Hal Clement in which scientists use slide rules. Sometimes it’s hard to keep from cracking up.

I’m not sure it would be entirely healthy to have a part of my brain living in the 1950’s-’60’s for an extended length of time so I think I’ll need a break from the classics after two or three more books at most. Before I received the Andre Norton books I had been starting to crave more Neal Asher and China Mieville. I need me some weirdness once in a while.

4 Responses to “Around the House”

  1. Jaquandor

    I just read an Andre Norton novel myself, “The Zero Stone”. Aside from some stylistic stuff dating from the 1960s, I didn’t find anything terribly dated about it. Ditto “Moon of Three Rings”, which I read a few months back. Norton doesn’t seem to suffer as much as other older SF authors do, which is nice.

  2. Andrea Harris

    I do think that one of the motifs of her science fiction is that sophisticated gadgets are fragile and not easy to replace and thus are restricted to the more “civilized” longer settled planets in her fictional universe, or else restricted to well-financed government operations like the Patrol (which are one of her stock organizations in most of her science fiction stories though not the particular parallel worlds series that Crossroads is in). Anyway, her stories tend to use the sophisticated, gadget-heavy worlds as a jumping-off setting or at the least only features them as as place for her heroes to not fit in and to want to (or end up) escaping; her primary setting is either a primitive world or series of worlds, sparsely-settled new colonies, places like that, where the characters have to rely on their wits and whatever they can MacGyver out of local materials. Even her space-faring stories feature “Free Traders” and other fringe-dwelling types who have to rely on second-hand spaceships and such and can’t afford to have all the nice things.

    One fifties-ish attitude that I miss from science fiction (though it lives on in tv shows like Doctor Who and others, after a fashion anyway) is the idea that you don’t have to rely on an array of ultra-sophisticated tech when you go exploring space, and that in fact relying on such can slow you down or even keep you from succeeding. One of the oldest plots that turns up in adventure fiction is that of the rich guy with his collection of brand-new toys versus the “simple man” seasoned explorer who has a knife, a rope, and a blanket, and they both go off on an expedition (or a competition) and the “simple” explorer always ends up besting Rich Gadget Guy in some fashion. But it seems that we’ve given up on ourselves and moved away from this even in popular culture. This worries me.

  3. Jeff Shaw

    Apertures is the lab of choice for me in Tulsa. I haven’t had any work done there in a while, but Natalie and the whole gang over there are great. I was the president of a now disbanded photo club (Waterworks Photography Assoc.), and we had our monthly meetings at Apertures. Fond memories.

    I’m rather surprised that you got bad results with your film. Did you take the film to a one hour place for developing?

  4. Lynn

    I can’t remember. It’s been 20 years or more since I last tried to get enlargements from film. It was when we lived in Virginia so it was someplace there.

Leave a Reply

Proudly powered by WordPress. Theme developed with WordPress Theme Generator.
Copyright © Violins and Starships. All rights reserved.