Violins and Starships

To Bail or Not to Bail

September 23rd, 2008

I found this Megan McArdle quote at Dustbury:

There is no industry in America that does not depend upon Wall Street. If credit seizes up and the banks fail, everyone will suffer deeply as businesses cut back for lack of capital, mortgage capital dries up, credit card rates rise and car loans become hard to get.

But that doesn’t mean one has to support the current bailout — you can add me to the list of libertarians standing athwart history shouting “stop!!!” I don’t think we can punish risk-taking managers and the shareholders who enabled them as thoroughly as we might like without possibly taking the rest of us down with them. But allowing banks to selectively offload their crap on the government without so much as a rap on the knuckles for having bought the crap in the first place is taking things too far.

That’s fairly close to my thoughts on the subject. I’m not shouting “Stop!” yet; I don’t think we should let the whole economy collapse because we want to punish a few big banks but, on the other hand, when you reward people for being stupid or corrupt they will just keep on being stupid or corrupt. Can’t we bail out the banks and punish the humans who are responsible for the mess?

2 Responses to “To Bail or Not to Bail”

  1. fillyjonk

    I’m thinking maybe we could bring back the public stocks (a la Colonial Williamsburg) for these folks. I tend to agree with you. While I guess I’m willing to have more of my money go down a hole to “save” the economy, I’m not happy that my taxes may go up because of some people’s irresponsible behavior.

    Maybe even public stocks with baskets of rotten tomatoes that taxpayers are allowed to throw at the investment banker of their choice…

  2. Lynn

    Haha. I like that – stocks for irresponsible stock traders.

Proudly powered by WordPress. Theme developed with WordPress Theme Generator.
Copyright © Violins and Starships. All rights reserved.